🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in graves at risk from coastal erosion state that indecision over how to address the problem is creating avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Historic Churchyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation details a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer sites. Officials say it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing looking for treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Along the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while working overseas. His parent expressed she lost sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to consider this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

The lack of agreement over when and how to handle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Some are calling for additional sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Different voices argue the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with residents.”

He added there was time to weigh all the options. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires good community discussions to discover the right answers for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in life after death, providing a theological perspective on the temporal loss of sacred ground.